FORUMS
- 5
| 04-28-2012, 05:02 AM | #2 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
Depending on batch or production date, it could either be 100% identical apart from engine mapping or there could be a different turbo or some either minor difference in parts used.
328i uses a single twin-scroll turbo. It isn't twin-turbo. |
|
|
|
| 04-28-2012, 01:16 PM | #3 |
|
.
|
cheers mate... didnt realise it wasnt twin turbo
|
![]() |
|
| 04-28-2012, 06:16 PM | #4 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() Drives: F30 328i Luxury - Sport Auto Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lancashire, North West England, UK
Posts: 1,941
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
And they both have a Twin Scroll turbo, meaning twin turbo power, but from a single turbo, so it's all good! ![]()
__________________
![]() Gone: 2006 BMW E60 520d SE 6MT Gone: 2009 BMW E90-LCI 330d SE 6MT - Awesome! 28th May 2009 - 28th May 2012 Current: 2012 F30 328i Luxury 8AT - Loving it! ![]() My 328i thread!http://www.f30post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=712673 |
|
![]() |
|
| 04-29-2012, 02:08 AM | #5 |
|
Private First Class
![]() Drives: F30 335i | E70 X5 | Z1 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Netherlands
|
2012 versions are the same engine. The 328i has 245hp, the 125i has 218 hp.
|
![]() |
|
| 04-29-2012, 08:46 AM | #6 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| 04-30-2012, 03:09 PM | #7 |
|
.
|
Blimey, such different power outputs from effectively the same engine.
I'd love to know how the twin scroll turbo works, very clever piece of tech! Thanks for the response
__________________
![]() AW 20d, 2tb, 552, lc, 397 plus others |
![]() |
|
| 04-30-2012, 03:15 PM | #8 | |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
They vary on compression ratios and turbo's
__________________
Nominated: Member of the Year, Most Contributing Member BMW if you are reading, I need a job |
|
![]() |
|
| 04-30-2012, 07:14 PM | #9 | |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() Drives: No BMW's Yet - Hopefully Soon Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 212
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 04-30-2012, 07:35 PM | #10 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Bolting on a roots-type supercharger in a V-bank on a 6 cylinder (read Audi S4) is nothing groundbreaking and runs off the belt power anyway. When BMW opens up the exhaust and compression a little on these twin-scroll models, it will destroy these other FI competitors. This is my favorite line from that article "In fact, with more valve overlap, the scavenging effect of the exhaust flow can literally draw more air in on the intake side while drawing out the last of the low-pressure exhaust gases, helping pack each cylinder with a denser and purer air charge." Essentially optimizing your twin-scroll to your cylinder firing sequence basically creates a vaccuum to increase your intake flow. awesome.
__________________
2011 X5 xDrive 35i Premium - 8AT, Cnv, Tch, 3rd Row, Cmfrt
2011 328i 4dr, 6MT - Sprt, Prm, Cmfrt |
|
|
|
|
| 04-30-2012, 08:01 PM | #11 | |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
But, in terms of power output the N54 is better. Even the latter N54's had a bit more power than the N55 does, and it's been confirmed by quite a number of dyno runs. Go to the 135i forum or the E90 335i forum and you'll see there is a difference in power output. BMW claims the N55 builds it's torque sooner, but in reality it's very minor. I too had high hopes for the N55 with it's valvetronic intake. I thought that with this setup it would allow better and greater high rpm power creation. Unfortunately that did not happen in stock form, and it's mainly due to the small size of the single turbo. Twins scroll is a great idea, and would have been even better in the N55 if BMW would have put in a larger twin scroll. As it is I believe the air flow rate of the 2 smaller turbos in the N54 have a slightly greater capacity than the slightly larger single twin scroll, and that that is the reason why tuners have had greater success in building more power with the N54 than with the N55. Still, I hold hope that the tuners will get better at programming the valvetronic and be able to use it in a greater capacity than they do now. After all, by not having a throttle plate, valvetronics immediate benefit is is less pumping loss as the engine tries to breathe against a restrictive plate, which valvetronic doesn't have. So I am surprised that the N55 stock was not as powerful as the N54 with it's more traditional intake. Don't sell Audi's 3.0 SC short. It's one heck of a modern SC engine. It's powerful, quite in cruise, and has excellent throttle response that is better than either N54 and N55. Audi's SC engine doesn't whine like typical SC applications, and puts out comparable power to either N54/N55. It's biggest fault is it's MPG, but it was more in line with the E90 335i. The new F30 335i has better MPG, mostly due to the new 8spd auto, which has 2 over drive gears, and that's where the 3 is getting it's biggest boost in MPG. Overall though, BMW's 3.0 is more fuel efficient when running normally mostly due to not having the parasitic drag of the SC's drive belt. I say "normally" because if you push the engine to give you 300hp, then it still costs in fuel and nearly the same quantity of fuel whether turbo or supercharged. The best thing about the SC's V6 is it's throttle response, it's there when you ask for it. As little turbo lag as BMW's N54 and N55 have, in comparison to the SC V6, their lag shows up when you drive the S4 back to back with the E90 N55. BMW's new N20 is quite an impressive little turbo. It has better throttle response than my N54 and better than the N55 in my experience in driving them. It's really quite amazing how quickly that little engine responds. And, it's putting out some very generous power as evidenced by recent dyno testing. Here's an interesting article on that: http://www.automobilemag.com/feature.../photo_05.html That dyno run shows 222hp and 245lb ft at the wheels. BMW rates it at 240hp and 260lb ft at the crank. From those dyno numbers, if we use a low drive train loss of 10%, torque at the crank is more like 273lb ft. If we use 15%, then torque at the crank is more like 287lb ft! At the BMW rated torque of 260lb ft, at a 10% loss wheel power should be around 234lb ft. At a 15% loss, wheel torque should be around 221lb ft. The N20 is pretty amazing. HP is BMW rated at 245hp. At a 10% loss, wheel HP should be around 220hp. At 15% loss, wheel HP should be around 208hp. That dyno shows HP at 222hp. At a 15% loss, real crank HP is around 260hp! Automatic's average drive train loss is around 20%. Manuals average loss is around 15%. Using 15% power train loss, the N20 power at the crank is more like 260hp and 287lb ft. NICE! Last edited by RPM90; 04-30-2012 at 08:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| 05-05-2012, 11:48 AM | #12 | |
|
.
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() AW 20d, 2tb, 552, lc, 397 plus others |
|
![]() |
|
| 05-06-2012, 11:58 AM | #14 |
|
.
|
That would work well for bmw i suppose, if they're based on the same engine..
__________________
![]() AW 20d, 2tb, 552, lc, 397 plus others |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|